Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2014 at 19:53 | comment | added | ojblass | I agree... the top 50 tags get their own site. | |
| May 26, 2014 at 7:16 | comment | added | AD7six | @dystroy How could that work "you haven't answered any questions in the tag <css-float-left-problem> do you know enough about that to vote on it?"? I agree with "a real problem", don't know if there is a technical solution to it though. An voting-entrance exam per tag =P? | |
| May 26, 2014 at 6:54 | comment | added | Denys Séguret | I disagree with almost everything in this answer but you point a real problem : people upvoting in fields where they don't have any competence. This makes people upvote trivial QA because they understand the problem and it seems it's a thing they ought to know, even if it's obvious. People should still monitor tags they don't master, because we're here to learn, but maybe there should be some kind of warning against upvoting when you don't know the language well enough. | |
| May 25, 2014 at 18:44 | history | edited | Peter Mortensen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Expansion, etc.
|
| May 25, 2014 at 1:23 | comment | added | Cody Gray Mod | We don't have "boards" now, so why should we break up and create them? | |
| May 24, 2014 at 16:18 | history | answered | wholerabbit | CC BY-SA 3.0 |